You are viewing gabrielleabelle

Previous Entry | Next Entry

DW vs LJ: ULTIMATE SMACKDOWN

flirt
Hey, I've been crossposting from Dreamwidth for over a week. That totally qualifies me for a compare n' contrast post, right?

My thoughts:

On the Dreamwidth side:

1. This is the most minor thing, but I love the "choose random icon" button. I use it all the time now. And then I giggle when it chooses a completely inappropriate icon with which to reply to someone. "Oh! I was replying with squee to this person, but it chose an angsty!Willow icon. Hee!"

I dig it.

2. Some of the DW-only poll features are very nifty. Especially the ability to create completely anonymous polls. I don't have immediate plans for it, but it may have come in handy in the past.

3. It's up when LJ is down. They're also good at providing service updates whereas LJ sucks at that.

4. Less SPAM. I'm able to actually allow anon comments on the DW side. I had to turn them off on LJ over the summer cause I kept getting SPAM while I was in the hospital and it made me angry with a morphine rage. So I turned that shit off.

On the Livejournal side:

1. As another minor thing, I so miss the tag chooser thingy and also the autofill for my music from LastFM. I have a shit memory, so being able to use the pop-up with my tags is very useful for me. And if the Music entry doesn't autofill whatever I'm playing, I'm tempted to lie if I'm listening to some crap music. LJ KEEPS ME HONEST.

2. I stopped reading my DW reading circle or whatever it's called. Cause...well...there's not much DW-only stuff. DW gives me DW. LJ gives me DW+LJ. So I get everything covered by reading my LJ flist. I tried joining some DW comms but 1) I'm not a big comm person; 2) There aren't many really active ones on DW.

3. I understand the purpose of the "subscribe" and "access" distinction on DW, but it really just makes things a bit too muddled for me. On LJ, I friend back most everybody who friends me. I do use filters to trim down my default flist and some personal entries, but mostly, anybody who friends me has access to the flocked post. I don't mind this. My journal's more public than private, so I don't really need the distinct categories.

On DW, though, since those distinctions exist, I feel awkward granting access to people, because it seems to come with a social expectation that they do the same back. But what if they don't want me to have access? What if they just want to subscribe to me for the meta? But then I give them access, so they feel awkward if they don't reciprocate?

I've mainly just reciprocated whatever people do to me first on DW so far, but most people have gone ahead and subscribed and granted access. So it's effectively like the LJ flist anyway, just with some redundancy. I'd prefer the flist concept, personally.

Um...okay, that's it. I know Dreamwidth is supposed to be ~MAGICAL~, but I've only picked up on minor differences between the two services. Or at least, minor differences to my process of doing things. And DW's openness ultimately hurts it. By allowing crossposting and such, it keeps people on the LJ side.

Heads up that some people discuss Dreamwidth with the implication that the "goal" is to get everybody to move over. I have no such goal. I'm gonna use whichever service works best for me and the peeps who follow me. I'm not married to Dreamwidth, so I don't particularly care if people gravitate over to it or not. LJ has the advantage for my needs right now, but since I can crosspost from Dreamwidth, I don't have any problem doing so to accommodate the DW-only folks. Though I'm gonna tentatively predict that the episode polls will move back over to LJ.

This entry was originally posted at http://gabrielleabelle.dreamwidth.org/353390.html. There are comment count unavailable comments on the DW side. Comment over there or over here. Roger! Over and out!

Comments

( 6 comments — Leave a comment )
goldenusagi
Jan. 6th, 2012 05:21 pm (UTC)
I feel awkward granting access to people, because it seems to come with a social expectation that they do the same back. But what if they don't want me to have access? What if they just want to subscribe to me for the meta? But then I give them access, so they feel awkward if they don't reciprocate?

See, and I've heard the exact opposite, that DW elimates the 'friend' quandry by making it easier to just follow someone for fic or meta without automatically letting them see your entries. But as you point out, you then have a whole DIFFERENT set of issues. New social interaction is awkward, no matter which site you do it on, lol.

It's up when LJ is down.

Sort of. During the DDoS attacks, DW slowed to a crawl for me.

Edited at 2012-01-06 05:22 pm (UTC)
gabrielleabelle
Jan. 6th, 2012 06:34 pm (UTC)
Heh. I think most people see their journals as a bit more private than I do. So the access/subscribe function doesn't grok for me. It's something that's never bothered me on LJ.
rebcake
Jan. 6th, 2012 05:59 pm (UTC)
Huh. Different strokes. Here are the things I like about DW:

1. The little arrow thingie that lets you stay on your reading page, while expanding a post's "cut".

2. The ability to differentiate between subscribing and granting access. My deal is that I don't want any (rare) sexually explicit or ultra violent material I post to be open to the public, only because I don't want my family members to stumble across it. So I f-lock it because none of them are members of LJ or DW, but they do check my journal occasionally. I'd be perfectly willing to let any members of either site read the stuff, but that doesn't mean that I want my reading list stuffed with everybody's PoTC fic, recipes, or tales of impetigo. I just want the Jossverse fic and meta, yo. The reality, of course, is that everybody who has bothered to go to DW is somebody that I want to read, so I end up subscribing anyway. ;-) (Also, that you can now friend people on LJ based on tags is helpful in cutting down my overstuffed f-list).

3. Crossposting joy. I love having a backup! Redundancy is our friend.

What I don't like about DW:

1. The coding is different. Bleargh.

2. It's more expensive.

3. There isn't as much there, there. (Content.) Although, sometimes that's restful...
gabrielleabelle
Jan. 6th, 2012 06:36 pm (UTC)
1. See, I thought this would be nifty. But I don't actually read my DW reading list and when I do, I'm a perpetual tabbed browser and prefer to open entries in a new tab rather than read them inline anyway. So I can see how it'd be cool for some people, but it doesn't do much for me.

2. Haha! I don't mind scrolling past people's recipes. I rarely filter people out of my default flist on LJ.

3. BACKUPS ARE KEY!
fenchurche
Jan. 6th, 2012 06:16 pm (UTC)
One of the main things that keeps me from reading DW with any regularity is that I've yet to find a display style that I like. Here on LJ, I'm using an old standard style... but it gives me *exactly* what I want. I'm able to give all of my friends different color combinations for their names (background and text), so when I'm at my flist page, it's VERY easy to tell them apart as I'm reading down the page. It's a silly, stupid thing, but I find it very annoying on DW that there appears to be no way to display those different colors in a sidebar (even though it lets me set them when I add someone to my circle).
gabrielleabelle
Jan. 6th, 2012 06:37 pm (UTC)
Ah! I've never used that feature on either site. I can see how that would be irksome.
( 6 comments — Leave a comment )

Profile

will57
gabrielleabelle
The One Who Isn't Chosen

Latest Month

May 2013
S M T W T F S
   1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031 

Pretentious Quote

"We are shaped by our thoughts; we become what we think. When the mind is pure, joy follows like a shadow that never leaves."
- the Buddha
Powered by LiveJournal.com
Designed by Lilia Ahner