You are viewing gabrielleabelle

Previous Entry | Next Entry

Episode Poll: 4.12 A New Man

pollgirl1
Alright guys, you know the drill!









Poll #1778241
Open to: All, detailed results viewable to: All, participants: 125

1. Walsh tells Giles that Buffy's lacking a male role model. True?

View Answers
Yes
9 (7.2%)
No
101 (80.8%)
Not sure
15 (12.0%)

2. Despite the fact that Riley looked uncomfortable when Buffy proved stronger than him (and kicked him across the room), by the end of the episode, he says he likes her strength and leadership skills. True?

View Answers
Yeah. He digs it completely.
10 (8.1%)
No. He obviously still has some issues later on.
97 (78.2%)
I have another answer
11 (8.9%)
Not sure
6 (4.8%)

3. In this episode, Spike moves out of Xander's basement to his own crypt. Why are the Scoobies letting him, you know, run free and loose and undusty? Choose all you think apply.

View Answers
They still think he may provide useful info on the Initiative (that they can't get from Riley)
46 (11.2%)
He's too much of a person to them to kill outright. It would be ooky.
98 (23.9%)
Spike was annoying them so much that they're glad to be rid of him
64 (15.6%)
They think that now that he can (and will) fight demons, he'll be a net force for good
48 (11.7%)
They're not that bright, the Scoobies
49 (12.0%)
Because Spike's a popular character and the writers had to find a way to keep him on the show
101 (24.6%)
I have another answer.
4 (1.0%)

4. Pretend you're a movie reviewer and give this episode a star rating.

View Answers
***** (Five stars)
9 (7.6%)
**** (Four stars)
51 (42.9%)
*** (Three stars)
54 (45.4%)
** (Two stars)
5 (4.2%)
* (One star)
0 (0.0%)


Oh, a note of apology if I don't reply to comments on this one. I've come down sick and am trying to rest up as much as possible. Discuss among yourselves!


Comments

( 45 comments — Leave a comment )
molly_may
Sep. 13th, 2011 07:21 pm (UTC)
Technically speaking, this is probably only a 3 star episode, but it gets an extra star from me for the following exchanges:

Walsh: The Slayer! We thought you were a myth.
Buffy: Well, you were myth-taken.

and

Spike: Picked up a tail.
Giles: Just a little one. It hurts when I sit down.
relurker
Sep. 14th, 2011 09:35 pm (UTC)
Good point! I never grow tired of that "mythtaken" thing, and the various dialogues between Giles and Spike are worth a lot of stars--and giggles!
snickfic
Sep. 13th, 2011 07:24 pm (UTC)
On 3, I think the in-story reason is basically that since Spike hasn't caused any particular trouble since he came to them (except for escaping that one time), they figure he'll continue to not cause trouble. Also I think they believe their own rhetoric about him being 'impotent.'
blackfrancine
Sep. 13th, 2011 07:27 pm (UTC)
1. Walsh is a hack--how unprofessional can you possibly be to be psychoanalyzing your student to someone you just met 10 seconds ago? And, pfft. She's just wrong. Giles is about as good of a male role model at this point as could possibly be expected from someone who's not her biological father.

2. So, my thoughts on this are that Riley really *wants* to be completely okay with Buffy's being stronger than him--but he's not. But, for the record, I really can't blame him too much--he's just indoctrinated into the same societal expectations that everyone else is too--at least he has the good sense to *want* to be okay with strong women.

catbirdfish
Sep. 13th, 2011 07:47 pm (UTC)
Walsh is a hack--how unprofessional can you possibly be to be psychoanalyzing your student to someone you just met 10 seconds ago?

Ugh, yes! And her insensitive "I see four limbs and a head" policy fills me with rage (for obvious reasons). It's in keeping with her character, but exceptions based on compassionate reasons... that's pretty standard for a prof, right? I know nowadays you could probably get a prof in trouble if they were being as hard-nosed as Walsh.
ever_neutral
Sep. 14th, 2011 12:07 am (UTC)
2. Yeah, word.
urania_calliope
Sep. 14th, 2011 01:52 am (UTC)
My thoughts exactly.
eowyn_315
Sep. 14th, 2011 02:41 am (UTC)
What you said. :)
local_max
Sep. 14th, 2011 04:17 pm (UTC)
1. I don't think it's that she's a hack, I think it's that she's a bloodhound. It takes her twenty seconds to piece together what Giles' role is in Buffy's life, and that it is dwindling (he has to go to *her* to search for Buffy?) and then sets out to destroy him with a few choice words for fun.

2. Word.
flagless_piracy
Sep. 14th, 2011 06:37 pm (UTC)
I don't think it's that she's a hack, I think it's that she's a bloodhound. It takes her twenty seconds to piece together what Giles' role is in Buffy's life, and that it is dwindling (he has to go to *her* to search for Buffy?) and then sets out to destroy him with a few choice words for fun.

Totally agreed. She's horrible and insane, of course she's going to pick on what's bothering someone and then use it to hurt them. She'd have made a brilliantly sociopathic and torture-loving vampire. Soulless Angel would've loved her.
eowyn_315
Sep. 15th, 2011 03:06 am (UTC)
She'd have made a brilliantly sociopathic and torture-loving vampire.

I WANT THIS FIC.
doublemeat
Sep. 14th, 2011 09:10 pm (UTC)
Completely agree on 1. She's smart, she's an exceptionally good liar, and she immediately sees the Scoobies as a threat to co-opt or undermine.
gryfndor_godess
Sep. 13th, 2011 07:52 pm (UTC)
1. No

2. I said another answer. Obviously Riley is not okay with it in the long run, but this early in the relationship I think he honestly thinks he is. Maybe subconsciously he assumes that once he gets to know her skills better and trains more, he'll be able to beat her and restore the "natural order"- i.e. subconsciously he thinks her being stronger is only temporary.

3. I checked every box but the last. A lot of the context around Spike up until he falls in love with Buffy doesn't make sense in-story. It makes me think of how the writers treated Anya, only in reverse: in her case, her characterization is inconsistent; in Spike's case, his characterization is mostly consistent (except for becoming less villainous as a whole than in S2) and everyone's else characterization in regard to him fluctuates.

4. I didn't rate it because I've only seen the episode once, and though I remember thinking it was well-done, I don't have strong feelings on it.
ceciliaj
Sep. 13th, 2011 08:00 pm (UTC)
That's a really good point about Spike and Anya.
gryfndor_godess
Sep. 13th, 2011 08:05 pm (UTC)
Thanks! :)
doublemeat
Sep. 14th, 2011 01:25 am (UTC)
Spike's a hedonist. He wants to be free, and he wants to have fun, which (while chipped) means killing demons.

Anya's characterization is inconsistent, but that's clearly deliberate to some extent -- see "Selfless". She doesn't really know who she is. My main problem with Anya from a writing standpoint is that her lack of remorse for her vengeance-demon days is too often treated as irrelevant or cute.
itsayamsham
Sep. 14th, 2011 05:49 am (UTC)
I do agree that Anya's lack of remorse is a writing problem, and I'm guilty of being amused by her comments about her vengeance days, however, to some degree I think the her lack of remorse being seen as irrelevant is deliberate.

I think Anya can be compared to Spike and his lack of remorse, around the time after he was chipped and was more immersed with the Scoobies, at least with Dawn, around Season 5-6. Xander sees no problem, or at least isn't disturbed, with Anya's lack of remorse with a thousand years of torturing and killing people and he's is in a relationship with her, both when she's human and somewhat when she's a vengeance demon, in S7. Yet Buffy's relationship with chipped Spike, who's also unremorseful, is seen as perverse and disgusting by Xander after their relationship was revealed. I think that correlation serves to indicate some flaws in Xander's judgment. He overlooks the fact that Anya spent years killing people and being evil, AND the fact that she went right back to killing people in S7, and has the brief fling with her later in S7 too, but with Spike, he just sees him as a monster, no matter the changes Spike goes through throughout the series.

Then again, I might be overthinking this. o.O
doublemeat
Sep. 14th, 2011 06:07 am (UTC)
I'd say the writers were underthinking it. Spike/Angel and Anya are treated very differently by the other characters w.r.t. their violent pasts. Anya is arguably more culpable, really, since she freely chose to become a demon (how's that work with the soul thing, anyway?), and she isn't presented as a significantly different person when she flips between demon and human.

It always bugged me, for instance, that only Willow ever seemed worried that Anya might end up physically hurting Xander, while everybody worried/judged constantly about Buffy's relationships with Angel and Spike.

Ultimately I think it's just that Anya was introduced as comic relief, and the writers had a hard time squaring that with the "real" moral issues of the series. They finally addressed it in S7, sort of.
itsayamsham
Sep. 14th, 2011 06:53 am (UTC)
Anya is arguably more culpable, really, since she freely chose to become a demon (how's that work with the soul thing, anyway?), and she isn't presented as a significantly different person when she flips between demon and human.

I'd say it reinforces the fact that, although a large emphasis is placed on the soul in the entire Buffyverse, it can mean nearly nothing - considering the big bads of the 6th season being human, most especially Warren. Completely souled but completely evil.

It always bugged me, for instance, that only Willow ever seemed worried that Anya might end up physically hurting Xander, while everybody worried/judged constantly about Buffy's relationships with Angel and Spike.

It is annoying. It seems like the Scoobies hold Buffy up on a higher moral pedestal.

Ultimately I think it's just that Anya was introduced as comic relief, and the writers had a hard time squaring that with the "real" moral issues of the series.

Agreed. For all the problems, though, Anya's still one of my favorite characters. :)
flagless_piracy
Sep. 14th, 2011 06:32 pm (UTC)
It always bugged me, for instance, that only Willow ever seemed worried that Anya might end up physically hurting Xander, while everybody worried/judged constantly about Buffy's relationships with Angel and Spike.

I'd say that is the case because Willow was the only one who actually got to see evil!Anya, way back in Doppelgangland. She was the one who was tricked into performing the spell. She was the one who had to deal with a vampire counterpart. She was the one who was at the Bronze when Anya got the idea to get her killed. No one else. Of course Willow has problems with Anya.

Also: On Spike/Angel Vs. Anya. The Scoobies know what happened with Anya, but they haven't actually witnessed her badness firsthand. So, yeah, she managed to get them all killed in an alternate reality, but the actual Scoobies haven't really lived it. Of course they're going to see Spike and Angel in a harsher way - unlike Anya, who hasn't actually harmed them (that they know of), Spike and Angel hurt them palpably and strongly. The Scoobies know firsthand what those two are capable of (murder, stalking, kidnapping, attempted murder, you name it), while they know what Anya is capable of only through her stories. Only in Selfless does she become an actual threat, and Buffy immediately decides to kill her. (Cue all the deliberate Angel parallels present in that episode, plus Xander's attack of Buffy for not killing Spike).
doublemeat
Sep. 14th, 2011 09:50 pm (UTC)
The Scoobies know what happened with Anya, but they haven't actually witnessed her badness firsthand.

That is a fair point. They sort of did see evil!Anya at the end of DPL, and I think they were more wary of Angel in S1/early S2 (before they had any firsthand reason to be) than they ever were of Anya, but that does make me feel a little better about it.

Edit: we're getting pretty far OT here, but one specific incident that still feels wrong to me is that when the Scoobies find out Anya has "relapsed" post-Entropy, it should've been retrospectively obvious that she was trying to get them to kill Xander. (Don't get me wrong, those scenes in Entropy are hilarious, but that's kinda what I'm talking about re: evil!Anya being played for laughs.)

Eh. I should just roll with it, really. I officially accept your explanation and move on! (I really do think it's a good point in general). :D
flagless_piracy
Sep. 15th, 2011 04:13 pm (UTC)
when the Scoobies find out Anya has "relapsed" post-Entropy, it should've been retrospectively obvious that she was trying to get them to kill Xander.

Well, they had more pressing issues at the time, so I suppose they didn't really get to think too much about it. As you say, it should've been clear in retrospect, but I don't know how much of Anya-related thinking they could spare to do at the time, what with Willow and (in Buffy's case, probably even Dawn's) Spike... Xander got to talk to Anya (sort of) in the shop, when she told him she couldn't actually hurt him (though I don't think that he really got what she was referring to). Willow and Giles had to deal with her issues. The only one who might've done any thinking about Anya's trying to get Xander killed was Buffy, and you know what? I think she did - hence her comment in Selfless that it had occurred to her before that she might have to kill Anya.
eowyn_315
Sep. 15th, 2011 03:11 am (UTC)
I think that correlation serves to indicate some flaws in Xander's judgment.

Agreed - and I don't think you're overthinking it. In "Selfless," Buffy makes the exact comparison, with both Angel and Spike, to point out Xander's hypocrisy in wanting to treat Anya differently than the vampires she dates.
ardentdelirium
Sep. 13th, 2011 08:09 pm (UTC)
re: Riley and strength issues, while he is taking the initiative vitamin cocktail, I think he totally digs that Buffy is strong. its not until he becomes Joe Normal that he has issues with it.
frelling_tralk
Sep. 13th, 2011 09:44 pm (UTC)
I think that Riley is being genuine when he talks of being impressed by Buffy's strength, but that there is still that lingering thought in the back of his mind that give him a week and he'll be able to take Buffy down. Even though I realise that it is said in a playful way in response to Buffy earlier overpowering him

I guess I see it as he doesn't have an issue with strong women (as he did end up with Sam after all), but that his issues are more with himself and wanting to feel that he and his partners are equals

Edited at 2011-09-13 09:58 pm (UTC)
eowyn_315
Sep. 14th, 2011 02:49 am (UTC)
I guess I see it as he doesn't have an issue with strong women (as he did end up with Sam after all), but that his issues are more with himself and wanting to feel that he and his partners are equals

I think there's a big difference between "strong women" and a woman who is stronger than you. You see it a lot in real life - as an example, it's now completely acceptable for women to work full-time, and many households have two working parents, and people call that gender equality. But it's still unusual (and considered emasculating) for a man to stay home with the kids while the woman is the breadwinner. It's as though many men are comfortable with feminism and strong women as a general ideal, but when a woman does something he believes is his responsibility, it's a threat to his masculinity.
doublemeat
Sep. 14th, 2011 03:44 am (UTC)
In the spirit of fairness, I think I should point out that a lot of women aren't OK with financially supporting a man either. :)

But yes, I think you're absolutely right about Riley's attitude. He doesn't mind that Buffy is strong, but when he's in a subordinate position to her in late S4/S5, it clearly bothers him.
eowyn_315
Sep. 15th, 2011 03:24 am (UTC)
In the spirit of fairness, I think I should point out that a lot of women aren't OK with financially supporting a man either. :)

Well, sure, but a man taking over traditionally female responsibilities isn't generally seen as threatening to women the way a woman taking on the male role is to men - presumably because the woman is gaining power in the relationship while the man is losing it.
gillo
Sep. 13th, 2011 10:03 pm (UTC)
1. Walsh is jealous as hell and determined to score as many points as possible. She cannot bear the idea that Giles is the "leader" of a powerful young woman, and she wants to neutralise his influence on Buffy as soon as possible. She has no right to talk about Buffy in that way and it is grossly unprofessional to make such judgements to a third party she has barely met.

2. Riley likes having a woman he doesn't have to hold back with, but not the thought that Buffy is more powerful than he is and fully in command of herself too.

3. The Doylist explanation is that Spike is inconvenient living either with Xander or Giles, both of whom have love lives, but he's way too popular to dust, so it makes sense to give him a crypt of his own. The Watsonian explanation is that the Scoobies find him a nuisance and believe he is harmless, and want to believe he is harmless. They think he may be useful in future, but don't want him underfoot.

4. I love this episode. Ethan! Giles chasing Walsh! Fyarl!Giles! So much to love, yet also a subtle exploration of where Giles is right now, emotionally and psychologically. 4 stars.
pocochina
Sep. 14th, 2011 12:24 am (UTC)
2. I think both answers are true, really. He is attracted to and interested in her awesomeness. But there's a level of exoticization and discomfort there, as well. He both likes and is wary of it. Maybe that never could have developed in a healthy direction because there's that element of othering to it, regardless.

3. I think it's important to them to be The Good Guys. They really want to only kill THE MOST DANGEROUS creatures, and Spike really can't fit into that category anymore.

I suppose you could even say it goes back to everyone's Angel Issues? That if they're going to stake Spike when he can't hurt people no matter what, there's really no excuse for letting Angel go on unliving when they know how potentially volatile he is, and they understandably don't want to deal with that. Erring on the side of mercy with both of them.
local_max
Sep. 14th, 2011 04:18 pm (UTC)
Great points all.
doublemeat
Sep. 14th, 2011 12:35 am (UTC)
1. I thought the prevailing pop-psych "logic" was that people need same-gender role models? Anyway, it's not something a real psych prof would say. Or at least, as a psych major, it's nothing any of my profs would have said. Half-baked, pseudo-Freudian bullshit. But Walsh is supposed to be unlikable, obviously.

2. Ultimately, no. While he's still with the Initiative, he's basically OK with it -- he's in a position of authority, so he doesn't feel like Buffy is his "boss", and the drugs make him nearly her physical equal. In this particular episode, yeah, he's fine.

3. I seem to be one of the few people who see the Scoobies' treatment of Spike in S4 as entirely plausible in the context of the story. He's impotent, he's actively helping them, and they know him as a person -- the last is the most important, because a major point of S4 is to contrast the Scoobies' humanistic approach with the Initiative's bureaucratic one. Sure, Spike's a popular character, but that's not really germane; he was a popular character in S2/S3, but a persistent antagonist, and the writers still found ways to keep him alive. No reason they couldn't have done the same in S4.

4. I gave it 3 stars, but it's probably more like 4. The Giles/Ethan scene in the bar is awesome (boo for Ethan's last appearance).
itsayamsham
Sep. 14th, 2011 06:05 am (UTC)
and they know him as a person -- the last is the most important, because a major point of S4 is to contrast the Scoobies' humanistic approach with the Initiative's bureaucratic one.

I never thought of Season 4 that way, but now that I think about it, it's completely true.

I suppose I just have no deep thoughts on S4 because it's not my absolute favorite, but I feel kinda dumb for letting that slip by. :x
doublemeat
Sep. 14th, 2011 07:53 am (UTC)
S4's not my favorite either. I see the themes they were trying to develop, like the formation of adult, independent identity and the relationship of individuals to groups/hierarchies, but the season was less coherent than, say, S2 or S6. It feels more like a series of short stories than like chapters in a novel.

It has some of my favorite and some of my least favorite episodes. It's a weird season.
vampluvr1753
Sep. 14th, 2011 12:48 am (UTC)
1) Yes, from Dr. Walsh's perspective, she doesn't have a male role model, but Giles is Buffy's male role model even though from an outside observer their relationship would be misunderstood.

2) He is telling the truth, but he doesn't yet know the amount of information that he has yet to learn about Buffy.

3) Willow is opposed to staking him, and I'm willing to assume that Anya feels the same way what with her giving him gifts for his new place and all. Xander and Giles have been fighting about who's going to ward with him so they are both happy to rid of him. And as for Buffy, I think that she's so focused on Riley and the Initiative, and since she knows that he can't hurt anyone, she doesn't care so long as he isn't getting into trouble.

4) Gave it a 3. It's a good filler episode that continues Giles' storyline and has a little bit on the other characters, but it isn't one that is very memorable or one that I make it a point to watch when I'm viewing this season. Though, I do like the banter between Giles and Spike.
samsom
Sep. 14th, 2011 01:28 am (UTC)
1. Okay, first, Giles can be her male 'role model' if she needs one, second, her male 'role models' keep disappointing her, and thirdly, she doesn't need male 'role models'. Sheesh, no wonder she turned out evil.

2. Another answer. I think he was fine with it as long as he had the Initative Chip of Super Enhancement that made him, not equal to her, but closer than regular human to her. As long as he had that and ALL the weapons and male bonding he wanted with his bros, he was good with it. When he lost all that, he started shivering with perceived male inadequecies.

3. first, second and sixth reasons. Mostly the second one. It would be very difficult, no matter what they said, to outright kill someone they've engaged in, fought with and lived with. Even a vampire.

4. Three stars. Giles and Ethan! Giles chasing Maggie Walsh as the Fyarl demon! Buffy looking into the Fyarl demon's eyes and intuiting that it was Giles in there! A good, solid fun episode.
concinnity
Sep. 14th, 2011 03:54 am (UTC)
Whee! I haven't polled for awhile. This episode gets a very solid four stars from me, because we get to see Anthony Head's rather wonderful comedic timing, which we hardly ever get in this series.

Honestly, he is *so good* at what he does that he blends into the background - which is the point, sure, but he's a genius actor really. It is easy to break him down to the stand-bys/tropes: heavy sigh, wipe glasses, frustrated & illogical paternalism, weighty stare. A lesser actor would have turned that sometimes-limited role into a total hack job.

tl;dr - Giles \o/!
treadingthedark
Sep. 14th, 2011 05:04 am (UTC)
I love parts of this episode. The Spike/Giles bits are so awesome. The aforementioned tail bit, the Giles rage, the jumping out of the care to chase Walsh, I could watch a whole episode of FyarlGiles and Spike in the Citroen.
itsayamsham
Sep. 14th, 2011 06:28 am (UTC)
I haven't seen this ep in a while, so the details are kinda fuzzy. As for the first question, however, I don't think Buffy needs any role models at this age. When the need for role models is discussed, I see it as generally referring to young children to teenagers. Buffy's had years of guidance by her mother and by her father-figure Giles. But Buffy's an adult now, she's expected to make her own decisions without the need for a guide or a model to base her decisions upon. She's expected to take all she's learned from those models and apply it to life. But besides all that: she's an adult therefore she can do as she pleases.

As for question number three, I think for Buffy it's mainly the fact that Spike technically can't hurt any humans. She would never kill, what she believes, is a defenseless creature; it's what she's entirely against. However, I think in this case it's naive, because Spike doesn't need his fighting skills to harm or kill anyone. There's a zillion other things he can do, like teaming up with Adam at the end of S4.
goldenusagi
Sep. 14th, 2011 08:00 am (UTC)
Because Spike's a popular character and the writers had to find a way to keep him on the show

DING DING DING we have a winner!
local_max
Sep. 14th, 2011 04:21 pm (UTC)
1. She has big issues with men, so I'd say sort of -- but it's not exactly like she NEEDS a stronger man in her life. Maybe just a better picture of positive masculinity so that she doesn't have to accept as read that all men are beasts.

2. He wants to be okay. He tries to be. It's adorable how hard he tries, but he ultimately fails.

3. Mainly that the Scoobies see him as a person, and essentially harmless, and can't continue taking care of him. The Scoobies are the anti-Initiative, and it makes sense then for them to err on the side of compassion and rehabilitation.
relurker
Sep. 14th, 2011 09:50 pm (UTC)
#1: Buffy doesn't need models, of either sex.
(Guys! It's college! Young adults, but adults they are: if models are needed, they only have to open their eyes and look hard. Maggie Walsh is evil.)
#2: I think Riley's got a long, long nose...
#3: I think that they can't kill him because he's too much of a person, but I checked a few more boxes because I think that the Scoobies like to think they have reasons!
#5: Get well soon! And thanks for the fun poll.
spikes_wish
Sep. 15th, 2011 04:08 pm (UTC)
This gets 5 stars from me due only to the hysterical, juvenile chasing down of Maggie Walsh whilst Giles is a demon.

Payback's a Fyarl Demon.
lokifan
Sep. 19th, 2011 09:28 am (UTC)
2. I think Riley likes Buffy's strength as long as he also feels special - and because she's uncertain about it. At that point, he's punched out Parker and been reassuring her, and he doesn't really understand how experienced Buffy is - so Riley feels like he's looking after her a bit. It's a combination of not feeling Special and feeling like he isn't a source of strength for Buffy that makes him lose it, for my money.

5. I LOVE THIS ONE. Giles and Spike! Giles and Ethan! Giles and Buffy! Giles and Maggie! ALL THE GILES.
mediumajaxwench
Oct. 3rd, 2011 03:44 pm (UTC)
Jumping in a million years late here because I don't think anyone else has said exactly what I think might true about Riley's statement on Buffy's strength and leadership skills. Riley is in the military, a hierarchical organization that requires leadership at a lot of different levels. So I can totally see Riley loving strength and leadership skills in his subordinates as long as they defer to him when he needs them to.

Combine that with what people were saying above about men loving strong women as long they're not stronger than the guy, and assume that Riley hasn't totally thought through what will happen in the moment that he and Buffy have a serious disagreement about how to carry out a mission, or even a conflicting mission, and it looks to me like we've got a recipe for Riley totally believing that he's okay with Buffy's power in the moment, and still having major issues with it later on when he loses his super-strength and it becomes clear that she isn't going to defer to him.
( 45 comments — Leave a comment )

Profile

will57
gabrielleabelle
The One Who Isn't Chosen

Latest Month

July 2012
S M T W T F S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031    

Pretentious Quote

"We are shaped by our thoughts; we become what we think. When the mind is pure, joy follows like a shadow that never leaves."
- the Buddha
Powered by LiveJournal.com
Designed by Lilia Ahner