So people on my flist kept pointing to this thread on Whedonesque as awesome beyond awesome. So I decided to kick back and snail my way through it. Then I hit this comment about Angel as a male feminist icon and my eyebrows nearly left my face.
Cause...really? Really? The paternalistic father figure whose purpose is to save the damsel? Really???
So I'm interested. Let's poll. Don't get caught up in the semantics of "feminist icon", folks. The basic gist is: Do you see Angel as an extraordinary example of a feminist* man in the media?
Poll #1599116
Open to: All, detailed results viewable to: All, participants: 151
Discuss as needed. Convince me.
* Not really referring to the specific political orientation, but just if Angel appears to follow a feminist philosophy in his actions.
Cause...really? Really? The paternalistic father figure whose purpose is to save the damsel? Really???
So I'm interested. Let's poll. Don't get caught up in the semantics of "feminist icon", folks. The basic gist is: Do you see Angel as an extraordinary example of a feminist* man in the media?
Poll #1599116
Open to: All, detailed results viewable to: All, participants: 151
Is Angel a male feminist icon?
Discuss as needed. Convince me.
* Not really referring to the specific political orientation, but just if Angel appears to follow a feminist philosophy in his actions.
- Current Mood:
recumbent - Current Music:Annie Johnson - Trust You | Powered by Last.fm

Comments
So the baby - motherhood - allowed her to choose to redeem herself...
So motherhood tamed the wild woman and brought her redemption.
It just bothers me. I liked Darla a lot, but I hated that plotline.
On the other hand, I was greatly bothered by the way that Cordy was destroyed because that made no sense and was totally unecessary destruction of a character. She was passive (hell comatose) bringing forth an evil (female) child that then hoodwinked teh menz. So with Cordy we have evidence of how Darla's story could have been much more destructive with her being much more passive (am still pissed on Cordy's behalf).
I'm okay with Darla feeling something for her child. It's a pretty primal instinct. If baby had a soul, she had created it, so that's something too. I totally understand your criticism and can't really argue against the criticism. It just didn't bother me all that much.
If I'm looking at AtS's poor treatment of women, the first character I point too is the needless destruction of Cordy, and the second character would be Lilah, because I never, ever, ever understood what they did to Lilah. Why, show, why? I'd even put Fred a bit higher on the list (though I've always suspected that Fred wasn't killed just to give Wesley man pain but because Joss thought Illyria was really, really cool. Still the whole "her soul was incinerated" as an afterthought of the show hacked me off). Darla, I thought, had a pretty good arc, significantly better handled than her having been offed with no thought whatsoever and no hesitation so that Angel could impress Buffy back on BtVS. The only female character on the show that I thought got a better arc was Faith, and again, I prefer Faith's arc and think she was treated more fairly in her arc on AtS than either of her stints on Buffy.
Cordy was screwed though. Boy she was massively, inexcusably screwed.
Edited at 2010-07-30 04:45 am (UTC)
At least this way, she had some agency.
Different things will bother different people. Honestly, Fred's death bothers me the most. Then Cordy's. Then Darla's pregnancy fiasco. But just because some stuff bothers me more doesn't meant I'll reserve comment on the stuff that bothers me less.