You are viewing gabrielleabelle

Previous Entry | Next Entry

I draw my parallels with a crayon

will57
Fanwank with me, folks.

As I was going through screencaps and transcripts (as one does), I was struck by an interesting unintentional parallel.

In Into the Woods, Spike walks into Buffy's room while she's sleeping naked. After he insists he has something to show her, Buffy waits for him to turn around. He scoffs that he totally doesn't care (but he does) and then turns his back. Can we give props to Spike for not trying to peek at Buffy dressing in the mirror a la Xander?

In Wrecked, Buffy walks into Spike's crypt while he's sleeping naked. She gives him the wassup about the Dawn sitch, and he stands up in his full naked!Spike glory. Buffy quickly turns her back, to which Spike makes a snide comment.

This must mean something. Really. It must!

Okay, it probably doesn't. But the coincidence amused me.

Comments

( 45 comments — Leave a comment )
witchway
Jun. 11th, 2010 05:03 pm (UTC)
They hadn't slept with each other in Into the Woods,right?

In the SECOND case, it meant that Buffy was trying to pretend that nothing had happened. Not only had she SEEN him naked she had done a lot more, but now she was NOT watching him dress. Always keeping him a step away.

In the first case I think it's just a matter of keeping the sexual tension up!
gabrielleabelle
Jun. 11th, 2010 05:11 pm (UTC)
They hadn't slept with each other in Into the Woods,right?

Uh, most obviously not.

I was thinking more along the lines of thematic parallels. It's definitely two different situations, but the sequence of events (one character walking in on the other sleeping naked, the turning around) and the role reversal is intriguing, even if not done purposely (as I'm certain it wasn't).
diamondtook862
Jun. 11th, 2010 05:43 pm (UTC)
Interesting connection. I approve of parallels!

Also note why they were sleeping naked: Buffy because she'd been sleeping with Riley, Spike because he'd been sleeping with Buffy. Yes, I know he put clothes on to come back and sleep in his room, and we assume that he always sleeps naked (is it only because of this scene?), but he even goes so far as to mention that he as sleeping at that time because of what they had been up to the night before.
gabrielleabelle
Jun. 11th, 2010 06:40 pm (UTC)
Ooooh...very true.

I swear, there's something deep going on there. I just need to ponder it more.
terendel
Jun. 11th, 2010 09:18 pm (UTC)
It's not just this scene. There's the scene where Anya is riffling through his room (can't remember episode name). He's naked in that one since she's going through his pants. (Side note: I almost bust a gut at the deer-in-the-headlights look he got when Anya said she was there for sex.)
diamondtook862
Jun. 11th, 2010 09:31 pm (UTC)
Oh, I do love that scene to death. Thanks for pointing that out! My imaginary naked!sleeping!spike is still intact.
diamondtook862
Jun. 11th, 2010 09:32 pm (UTC)
It's Sleeper, I think.
menomegirl
Jun. 11th, 2010 09:00 pm (UTC)
Hm.....Didn't Xander peek at Buffy undressing in Never Kill A Boy on the First Date?
gabrielleabelle
Jun. 11th, 2010 09:15 pm (UTC)
Yep. That's what I was referring to.
menomegirl
Jun. 11th, 2010 10:48 pm (UTC)
I'd give props to Spike if it wasn't for the sweater-stealing (or was it panty-stealing? I can't remember.) while he was in her room uninvited. That was low and freaky.

Also, that was not an episode that showed Spike at his best.

Edited at 2010-06-11 10:49 pm (UTC)
gabrielleabelle
Jun. 12th, 2010 12:26 am (UTC)
'Twas panty-stealing. And yep. Spike had the stalker thing going on at this point. Still, Xander's mirror peep show skeeved me out in S1.

It was an aside comment. Not meant to be an in-depth defense of Spike's behavior.
menomegirl
Jun. 12th, 2010 12:34 am (UTC)
Xander's mirror peep show skeeved me out in S1.

Me too. I often think people forget those small, not-good traits of Xander's.
angearia
Jun. 12th, 2010 12:34 am (UTC)
Xander was the precursor to skeeving over Buffy (and even the AR thing). When Spike comes along, all soulless and evil, it's not treated as harmlessly (nor should it be). It bothers me when guys get away with this stuff 'cause they're good and moral and Nice. And it's why I love Spike--he owns up to his mistakes, changes and grows.
infinitewhale
Jun. 12th, 2010 12:47 am (UTC)

Xander waltzing into Buffy's bathroom in S6 still bothers me to no end.
gabrielleabelle
Jun. 12th, 2010 01:27 am (UTC)
YES! I mean, hell, it was intrusive when Spike did it, and it's intrusive when Xander did it.

Xander gets away with quite a bit of skeevy shit. His revenge love spell in BBB was discussed a while back. He never really owns up to it all, though.

Spike's definitely skeevy in S5, but it's shown as skeevy, and he's called out on it all. Plus, he goes above and beyond to change, and Buffy ultimately doesn't fall for him because of the skeeviness. She falls for him because he eventually recognized it was wrong. Thus subverting the horribly annoying Stalking Gets the Girl trope you see in romantic comedies)
infinitewhale
Jun. 12th, 2010 07:52 am (UTC)

He never owned up to attacking her in The Pack eihter. Yeah, I guess it falls under the "not really Xander" excuse (though I don't think that truly holds up, but whatever), but it's just another case of him ducking.

Xander's probably the character I disagree with most of fandom about. He has the "always loyal" label despite siding against Buffy in S2, S3, S5, S6 and S7. I think Willow was far more loyal than Xander.
(Anonymous)
Jun. 12th, 2010 09:07 pm (UTC)
He did steal a sweater at another, later occasion. The one he made Harmony wear at the start of Crush. Another episode that didn't exactly show Spike at his best...
gabrielleabelle
Jun. 12th, 2010 09:16 pm (UTC)
Yes. There are a lot of episodes that don't show Spike at his best. I'm wondering why people feel the need to bring them up, though, in response to a comment giving him minor kudos over Xander...
dragonflylady77
Jun. 11th, 2010 10:08 pm (UTC)
What's the colour of the crayon you're drawing this very interesting parallel with?

I agree, it must mean something.
And yes, Spike totally gets points for not trying to sneak a peek!
gabrielleabelle
Jun. 12th, 2010 01:27 am (UTC)
The color of crayon is Cerulean...like Spike's eyes. :)
dragonflylady77
Jun. 12th, 2010 01:34 am (UTC)
Word.
angearia
Jun. 12th, 2010 12:42 am (UTC)
Important parallel is important.

I think it mostly signifies the change in roles (perhaps even the change in gender roles in Season 6? Buffy is being gentlemanly by turning her back?). Spike is the pursuer in Season 5, Buffy becomes more the pursuer in Season 6.

Oh, just had a thought. Since Spike typically plays the feminine to Buffy's masculine, I'm imagining his stalking in Season 5 as if he actually were a woman. Imagine Spike innocently in Buffy's house because (s)he stuck around with Buffy the night before, perhaps got invited in because of the sunlight and the fact that (s)he was decent to Buffy. Buffy and Joyce go off to the hospital and lady!Spike ambles around the house, comes across (instead of rifling through Buffy's room) one of Buffy's pieces of clothes and sniffs it to catch her scent, sighing with pleasure.

Is it still as skeevy? Still as gross?

Because women being attracted to "men"'s scent doesn't seem as skeevy to me. I mean, it's partly why you always see ladies sleeping in men's shirts the morning after--scent and also it's more comfortable sometimes than what the woman wore.

I dunno. Have you ever leaned in closer to a guy just because they smelled amazing? I've totally done that. And I haven't like gone looking for clothes to smell when I'm not with someone, haha, but I can see it happening somewhat innocently in an unrequited-love situation.

Edited at 2010-06-12 12:43 am (UTC)
gabrielleabelle
Jun. 12th, 2010 01:34 am (UTC)
I think it mostly signifies the change in roles (perhaps even the change in gender roles in Season 6? Buffy is being gentlemanly by turning her back?). Spike is the pursuer in Season 5, Buffy becomes more the pursuer in Season 6.

I think you're onto something, though Buffy wasn't turning her back to be gentlemanly. She was doing it as a form of denial to pretend that she hadn't already seen Spike very, very naked. I'm hungry and sleepy, so I'm not sure where to go with that.

Is it still as skeevy? Still as gross?

I would say yes, though I'm probably not representative of the general population's take. :)

I think any sniffing of sweaters in someone's house is intrusive. Plus, Spike did grab Buffy's panties as Riley dragged him out. That would be creepy even if Spike were a woman.

But then, I've never quite managed to believe that Buffy invited Spike in after FFL. I always imagined Spike had pretended to leave, but then stuck around outside and eavesdropped (thus hearing about Joyce being sick). Then he went inside after Buffy had gone and started, you know, sniffing her clothes. I can't imagine Buffy would leave a free-roaming Spike in her house alone.

I think I polled on this once, though, and I was in the minority by a large margin.

I dunno. Have you ever leaned in closer to a guy just because they smelled amazing?

lol! Nope. My sense of smell is pretty much non-existent so the whole 'scent' thing is just beyond me. It weirds me out when guys (and some girls) smell my hair during a hug.
angearia
Jun. 12th, 2010 01:40 am (UTC)
Haha, I was more saying Buffy was being gentlemanly with a sense of irony. Like on the face of it, it's the gentlemanly thing to do except she's not doing it for that reason. Just as Spike doing it earlier--he's so not a gentleman.

I'm more imagining the scenario in a less stalkery situation where Spiketta has an invitation to be in the house while Buff isn't there. It seems less creepy to me, but I'm imagining it as Spiketta not delibeartely rifling through drawers. Maybe happening across it accidentally and noticing the scent.

I actually have no sense of smell anymore (gah! my nose fails :( why?) but scent was always very triggery for me with memory and attraction. I can remember not thinking much about this one guy, then happening to stand close enough to him one day and smelling his cologne. HOT. I think it's a visceral thing. When I was 13, I remember messing around with men's cologne swatches over at my friends and swooning over the scents.

Edited at 2010-06-12 01:40 am (UTC)
diamondtook862
Jun. 12th, 2010 03:54 am (UTC)
Wait- people think Spike was in the house the next morning because Buffy invited him to stay the night? Is that why there is so much fic about this? The idea never occurred to me. I did think they stayed on the porch for a long time and she eventually told him about her mom, but I thought he'd just snuck in because he knew she'd be out (since he knew about her mom and all). Loving Spike for the back porch scene in FFL and being completely creeped out by the underwear thing in the next scene is one of the difficulties of evil!Spike, that's for sure. I've never understood why soulless = underwear fetish.
gabrielleabelle
Jun. 12th, 2010 05:06 am (UTC)
Wait- people think Spike was in the house the next morning because Buffy invited him to stay the night?

Not sure about that specific detail. As I recall, I polled about whether Buffy talked to Spike after FFL ended (And most people thought she had). As I further recall, people used to fact that Spike was in her house the next day to support their conclusion (with the implication being that he was invited in, I suppose).
angearia
Jun. 12th, 2010 06:08 am (UTC)
Heh. I'm imagining him hiding in the basement now.
gabrielleabelle
Jun. 12th, 2010 06:17 am (UTC)
*g*

We did see him down there in Listening to Fear. Oh, stalker!Spike.
local_max
Jun. 12th, 2010 06:37 am (UTC)
I think it mostly signifies the change in roles (perhaps even the change in gender roles in Season 6? Buffy is being gentlemanly by turning her back?). Spike is the pursuer in Season 5, Buffy becomes more the pursuer in Season 6.

This. Great insight!
probablecylon
Jun. 12th, 2010 05:52 am (UTC)
[Can we give props to Spike for not trying to peek at Buffy dressing in the mirror a la Xander?]

I hadn't thought about it, but falling for Buffy brings out William-ness -- the awkward, uncertain, timid, shy, inexperienced boy he was, and the struggle which eventuates in going to get his soul is a struggle to unify the two. Spike created himself by interring William; Buffy unintentionally resurrects William & rather than trying to cure himself, Spike yields to her influence.

gabrielleabelle
Jun. 12th, 2010 06:15 am (UTC)
Yep. That's one of the major themes of FFL, too. Spike coming full circle in his development right back to William when he choose to try to comfort Buffy rather than kill her. He spends the rest of S5 and S6 trying to figure out how to reconcile that William-ness with his vampire-ness.
ever_neutral
Jun. 12th, 2010 06:05 am (UTC)
Spike and Buffy have MANY parallel scenes. There's also the Crush/Wrecked one. "It doesn't change anything", "It changes everything"/"Things have changed", "Nothing's changed". *pets my parallel-y ship*

Re: Xander and privacy. On the topic of coming into Buffy's bathroom - I always found Xander's insensitivity regarding the AR kind of annoying. He tells Dawn about it against Buffy's will, and then constantly throws it in Buffy's face after the fact, as though she's not traumatised enough. I get it, friendly concern, but it always struck me as a remarkably insensitive way to be supportive... But for the rest of S7, he shuts up and lets Buffy be, so good.
gabrielleabelle
Jun. 12th, 2010 06:17 am (UTC)
There's also the Crush/Wrecked one. "It doesn't change anything", "It changes everything"/"Things have changed", "Nothing's changed". *pets my parallel-y ship*

Whoa! Nifty! *scritches ship's ears*

Re: Xander. Yeah, definitely. I don't know that Buffy would have told anybody what had happened if Xander hadn't spilled the beans. And that's her story to tell, not his. He just had a hate-on for Spike in late S6 and it got the better of him (He stormed into the bathroom because he saw Spike's jacket in the entry, after all).
local_max
Jun. 12th, 2010 06:39 am (UTC)
And now that we're talking about Crush, there's this exchange in both Crush and DT--

Buffy: I love you.
Spike: No, you don't.

And then in Chosen....

*sighs happily at parallels*
gabrielleabelle
Jun. 12th, 2010 06:45 am (UTC)
*flails*

I SEE WHAT SPIKE DID THERE!
local_max
Jun. 12th, 2010 07:10 am (UTC)
Wait, apparently that dialogue isn't in Crush. OH WEL, IT'S STILL IN DEAD THINGS :)
ever_neutral
Jun. 12th, 2010 07:56 am (UTC)
Yes! The Dead Things/Chosen parallel!

"I have to do this. Just let me go." "I can't. I love you." "No, you don't."

to

"I gotta do this!" "I love you." "No, you don't. But thanks for saying it."

It makes me happy.
probablecylon
Jun. 12th, 2010 06:43 am (UTC)
There's 'friendly concern', and then there's -- well, proprietariness about the 'tude. (And another reason to dislike the notion of Buffy suddenly feeling that, oh, perhaps now romance with Xander . . . akh, too inane even to recount it . . . )
infinitewhale
Jun. 12th, 2010 07:56 am (UTC)

Come on now, we all know large swathes of the last couple seasons didn't actually happen. :P
ever_neutral
Jun. 12th, 2010 07:58 am (UTC)
Yeah. It's hard to be a proponent of Bander considering the judge-y history.
witchway
Jun. 12th, 2010 12:04 pm (UTC)
OK HOW AB OUT THIS
FIRST TIME -- Buffy is vunerable, and no way willing to share it. Spike accepts this.

SECOND TIME -- Spike is vunerable, and very much willing to share it, but Buffy rejects what he is sharing. Spike makes fun of her because of it.




How's that?
gabrielleabelle
Jun. 12th, 2010 05:19 pm (UTC)
Re: OK HOW AB OUT THIS
Works for me.
probablecylon
Jun. 13th, 2010 08:52 am (UTC)
Re: OK HOW AB OUT THIS
I think Buffy is more vulnerable in the second instance, because there's a gulf between the complete sexual exposure they had in the house & and the kind of emotional exposure that would be involved by looking directly at Spike as he dresses. Spike's misunderstanding is that this is hypocritical modesty, but it's really a self-protection, a concealment of the layers of desire, humiliation, exultation, and a more-than-emotional nakedness -- and she fears that Spike would see THAT.

dramapoette1
Jun. 12th, 2010 05:59 pm (UTC)
Hey! I've been a lurker on this journal for awhile, and I've finally worked up enough moxie to come out of the shadows and say hello! *tries not to be awkward* So...yeah. I really love all the meta you've done and the rape linkspam and pretty much think you're one of the awesomest people on LJ. Can I be your friend? :)

BTW, totally agree on the Xander skeeviness. I recently watched "Surprise", and it bothers me every time he mentions that Buffy crying is a part of his fantasy in which she gets over Angel and hooks up with him and his private jet. And don't get me started on "Bewitched, Bothered, and Bewildered".
gabrielleabelle
Jun. 12th, 2010 08:07 pm (UTC)
Oh! I'd forgotten about that comment in Surprise! Right on. I tolerated his little fantasy, even though it smacks of Nice Guy-ness. But the whole part about Buffy crying skeeved me out. That's just...icky.

Friends are awesome and welcome. :)
( 45 comments — Leave a comment )

Profile

will57
gabrielleabelle
The One Who Isn't Chosen

Latest Month

May 2013
S M T W T F S
   1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031 

Pretentious Quote

"We are shaped by our thoughts; we become what we think. When the mind is pure, joy follows like a shadow that never leaves."
- the Buddha
Powered by LiveJournal.com
Designed by Lilia Ahner